Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Perpetual Calendar; Year 4000-and-beyond

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Perpetual Calendar; Year 4000-and-beyond

    Greetings --

    This query is sure to send you scrambling for your Earth Science and/or Astronomy Books.

    Is it true that the Gregorian Calendar gains one day each 4000 years? If so, it implies that there would be no February 29th in the year 4000 and every 4000 years thereafter.

    I trust than we have some PowerBasic DOS/CC/Win routines to deal with the Gregorian Calendar -- but do they deal with the 4000-year scenarios described above?

    Information about the Perpetual Calendar -- general calendar facts.

    Topics/features include -- the origins of the Gregorian Calendar // How the calendar comes "back to square" every 400 years // Was it necessary to drop those 10 days in 1582, with two never-adopted alternative methods shown // Is there a 4000-year rule? // Links to the Symmetry-454 Calendar, a radical alternative to the Gregorian Calendar // Links to other Time and Date sites // A 3000-year perpetual calendar
    Last edited by Frank Ferrell; 18 Feb 2017, 05:49 PM.

  • #2
    Ahh, the dread "Y4K bug"... could be that the rumors aren't exaggerated. According to the U.S. Naval Observatory, Astronomical Applications Department, "It will take about 3300 years before the Gregorian calendar is as much as one day out of step with the seasons." Question is, of course... why care?

    Supposing they mean 3300 years from 2001, to be sure, you're looking at year 5301, not year 4000, so you have a little leeway to consider the question.


    ------------------
    Tom Hanlin
    PowerBASIC Staff

    Comment


    • #3
      Isn't there a 4000-year rule?
      If you try to make something idiot-proof, someone will invent a better idiot.

      Comment


      • #4
        Greetings ---

        Matthew -- Thanx for that link - it's a keeper!

        They've changed the link since you first posted it. Here's the new one--
        Isn't there a 4000-yr rule?

        Tom -- Since the time these postings first appeared (Fall 2001), I have chosen to program PERCAL without using the 3300 year deal you mention. Nor does PERCAL have adjustments for year 4000, 8000, etc.

        I thank you for your info just the same!

        Thanx-A-Lot, Happy New Year and Enjoy, Frank

        Last edited by Frank Ferrell; 20 Mar 2016, 09:53 PM. Reason: Replacing Dead Link

        Comment


        • #5
          Frank,
          You sure are the epitome of an optimist, but assuming that 1) humanity, 2) computers, and 3) your program still exist in another 2,000 years, take a look at this URL: http://www.washington.edu/imap/docum...endar.txt.html
          Good luck,
          Colin.

          ------------------

          Comment


          • #6
            A previous "BUMP" message, which the Forum Moderator may delete.

            [This message has been edited by Frank Ferrell (edited January 08, 2005).]

            Comment


            • #7
              I wrote an article about this:
              http://www.thipdar.com/dox/leapday.html

              The 'truth'-ness of the leapyear situation oscillates FTFT.

              "Default Rule: A year will not be a Leap Year.
              1st Exception: If the year value leaves a remainder of zero
              when it’s divided by four, it will be a Leap Year.
              2nd Exception: If the year value leaves a remainder of zero
              when it’s divided by 100, it will not be a Leap Year.
              3rd Exception: If the year value leaves a remainder of zero
              when it’s divided by 400, it will be a Leap Year."

              The application of Modular Arithmetic ought to be obvious.
              It boils down to a 4-step ladder of IF statements.

              The next exception might appear to be 10,000, but I'm not sure
              that it is wise to extrapolate out that far. The situation may
              not resolve with the expected regularity, and the Earth will
              have slowed by then.

              In all of my studies, there was no indication at all of any
              exception for an interval greater than the 400 year interval.

              **********

              In Re: The Gregorian Calendar, be careful about the 'beginning'
              of it. To accurately emulate the beginning, you have to
              consider the geographic location in question as well as the
              temporal location in question, because it was not uniformly
              adopted everywhere at the same time. Even different regions of
              some countries adopted the new calendar at different times,
              usually for religious reasons.

              This particular programming problem turned out to be so complex
              that I gave up in horror and decided to pick something simpler.


              Kurt Schultz
              [email protected]
              Don't sweat it, it's only ones and zeros

              Comment


              • #8
                Greetings --

                UPDATE: 1-08-2005

                As Calendars and Time Keeping are important programming elements -- be it in PowerBasic DOS or any other language -- I thought I would revive this topic.

                Thanx-A-Lot, Happy New Year and Enjoy, Frank


                Last edited by Frank Ferrell; 20 Mar 2016, 09:55 PM. Reason: Removing dead links

                Comment


                • #9
                  The 4-year, 100-year, and 400-year rules are approximations.
                  Actually, they are quite good as far as they go. In continuing
                  to look further, we are faced with the fact that the revolution
                  of the earth slows down due to pull from the moon, making our
                  days longer, and the moon moves further from the earth over time,
                  which may increase the degree of wobble in the earth's rotation,
                  and as we've just learned, major disturbances on the earth can
                  also effect the earth's spin on its axis or the tilt of that
                  axis. On top of that, the movement of the earth around the sun is
                  not precise from one orbit to the next. There are suspicions that
                  some orbits may extend the year and move the earth further from
                  the sun, adding to the tendency of cyclic ice ages.

                  The problem is that adding or deleting a day in the calendar is a
                  coarse adjustment. Depending on all these factors, the need to
                  make a change is likely a belated adjustment, or one where you
                  cross the midpoint and create error in the opposite direction by
                  overkill. My previous experience showed that every 2000 years
                  was one of the possible adjustment points as you try to tweak
                  the calendar +/- one day at a time, but we are pass that point
                  now. Another adjustment point is every 23,000 years, but I
                  imagine this will be quite a different world by then, so I think
                  I will hold off on devising a rule for that situation.

                  Who knows? We may revise our calendar so that each month has 28
                  days, and there are thirteen months in all. Then we have one to
                  three days at the end of the year to party and tinker with before
                  we start the year over. Instead of twelve monthly calendars, you
                  only need one, since each calendar day for the year will fall on
                  the same day of the week. We can adjust our new calendar so that
                  either the year starts with the shortest day of the year, or
                  look to moving things around so that month 13 covers the present
                  month of October - that way people who believe that thirteen is
                  unlucky can practice other superstitions during that period.


                  ------------------
                  Old Navy Chief, Systems Engineer, Systems Analyst, now semi-retired

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Feel free to download a fistful of calendar code here: http://zijlema.basicguru.com/pbdos.html

                    ------------------
                    Egbert Zijlema, journalist and programmer (bas underscore guru at planet dot nl)

                    Opinions expressed here are not necessarily true

                    Egbert Zijlema, journalist and programmer (zijlema at basicguru dot eu)
                    http://zijlema.basicguru.eu
                    *** Opinions expressed here are not necessarily untrue ***

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Greetings ...

                      It was 2006 (previous edit) and now it's 2017 (latest edit), and we are using Year Calendar 1 - my top favorite Year Calendar, followed by 14, 6, 12, 4, 10, 3 and 9.


                      ------------------
                      Thanx-A-Lot and Enjoy, Frank
                      Last edited by Frank Ferrell; 18 Feb 2017, 05:56 PM.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X