"dBase Library for PB-DOS" Contribution

[Gerhard Kropf]

And again, PowerBasic for DOS is not death.
For many cases, the old dBase DBF file format is still the best choice to use.
The old rule "fixed length records waste a lot of valuable space" also won't really matter in todays time, where a "normal" OS already grabbs a few GB of your harddisc.

Flat files, speedy access, transparent and calculatable records, still a great solution for all kind of medium sized datastructures.

How easy to handle any kind of dataset with a predefined number of records ...
How easy to handle a whole year on a daily base. Just use a DBF file with 365 records ...

The library is available for PB-Dos and PB-Win/CC, using exact the same commands.

To handle further updates and changes better, I decide to host the whole archive on my own webspace. Please go to below link to download the actual archive as well as additional informations (if available) ...

www.china-bizz.com/software/powerbasic


The dBase file format is well designed, but not completely documented for public. A lot of analysis and debugging was necessary to build up this library. All my thanks goes to

Daniel P. Stasinski
Richard Maurino
Erik Olson
and Manuel Valdes

This library is based on ideas, code and inspirations from them.

If anybody has some ideas for functions or other enhancements, feel free and drop me a PM ...
Hopefully, this all is still useful for somebody out, at least for me it is ...

Have fun

Gerry

[Dale Yarker]

First, this is agreement, dBase files can still be useful (and not just PBDOS).

More than flat and fixed record count databases, also relational and multiple indexes.

It is well documented if you use the AKA "XBase". For example see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XBase, and included link http://www.clicketyclick.dk/database...mat/index.html.

((minor question - how did you arrive at 364 records in annual database? typo?))

Easier to manually repair an XBase file than an mdb.

Cheers,

[Dean Gwilliam]

>For many cases, the old... is still the best.
Yes...I'm a fan.
Thanks Gerry...Great stuff!

[Michael Mattias]

>The library is available for ....PB-Win/CC, using exact the same commands.

Also available on Win/32:

dbase ODBC drivers:
https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/lib...=vs.85%29.aspx

dbase (IV) OLE provider
https://www.connectionstrings.com/dbf-foxpro/

These options are NOT available under MS-DOS.

MCM

[Gerhard Kropf]

The right tool for a given job ...

There might be situations, where you really need ODBC, JET, SQL, Btrieve, c-treeACE, FLAIM, NuoDB, BDB, ... or one of the variouse others around.

And in times, where a simple "hello world cooking recipe administration tool" with 45MB filesize can be sold, many people consider the above as a cool solution to handle a few 100 recipes.

But to be fair, we should also accept, that such solutions are "sometimes" a bit oversized and overkilled.

Please, keep this thread clean, it is no flame war pro or against something. It is just a contribution for all outside, who will have a benefit from. And I guess, the people who do have a benefit from know this very well.

G.

[Michael Mattias]

But to be fair, we should also accept, that such solutions are "sometimes" a bit oversized and overkilled.

Let's also be fair to those who design commercial package solutions for business.

What might be 'oversize' or 'overkill' for 'User A' could be just barely sufficient for 'User B.' As a designer you pretty much have to deal with the "worst case scenario."

I have said for many years both here and elsewhere that what makes a particular software solution "right" is totally and completely up to the user. I have no reason to change my story now.


MCM

[Gerhard Kropf]

again, "The right tool for a given job ..."
btw. thats why we all use PowerBasic, "because all the .NET spoiled mass-users out cry for" ...

G.

[Brian Alvarez]

I Spent all day figuring out the TYPES for DBF files and i just found out there is a recend thread for it... hehehe.

I plan to use this in an android app, i made some UDT's based on these:
http://www.dbase.com/Knowledgebase/INT/db7_file_fmt.htm

Why are some parts of the UDT blank? there are some fields mixed with the unused fields that I think are used. Are these unimplemented features of the example or they never were used in real world?

[Dale Yarker]

Do you mean the "reserved" members, or the member for the number of digits after the decimal point when a character field is being defined?

Been at least a decade since I worker on the guts of a dBase/XBase file. One thing that come immediately to mind is ththat the header and field definitions are padded to a multiple of the record length, then the first record starts.

[Brian Alvarez]

I meant the fields that are betweeen the unused fields. I am not sure that those are for though. That's why i ask.

[Dale Yarker]

try this reference instead. http://www.clicketyclick.dk/database...tml#DBF_STRUCT

The field descriptor items between unused are labeled, so I don't understnd the problem.

Maybe confusing data records, which aren't really UDTs with field decriptors which can conveniently kept in UDTs?
????

[Brian Alvarez]

Thanks Dale, it worked.

[Gerhard Kropf]

I ported the whole dBase library to FreeBasic ...
All versions are supported ... even FBC for ARM on a Raspberry PI

[Roger Garstang]

I used to read the old stuff direct from the file. Main meat of the code was pretty simple:

Type DB3Header
    ver        As Byte ' 03H without .DBT, 83H with .DBT 
    year       As Byte
    month      As Byte
    day        As Byte
    numRecords As Dword
    headerSize As Word
    recordSize As Word
    reserved   As Asciiz * 20
End Type
Type DB3FieldDesc
    fieldName    As Asciiz * 11
    fieldType    As String * 1 'CNLDM
    dataAddress  As Dword
    fieldLength  As Byte
    decimalCount As Byte
    reserved     As Asciiz * 14
End Type

' C= Character
' N= Numeric- -.1234567890
' L= Logical- ?YyNnTtFf
' D= Date YYYYMMDD
' M= Memo with 10 digits representing a .DBT Block#