Is it too much to ask for more than sixteen calling parameters in the
next version of PB for DOS for CALLS and SUBS and so on?
Yes, I realize that SPEED is all important! Yes I realize that the
added number of them imposes other penalties as the total possible
grows. However, even if I had 32 instead of 16, it would have made
a whale of a lot less PUBLIC use needed for really complex work.
Perhaps the code behaves as now for 16 or less, and slower, but still
can be compiled for 17-32 .. and so on ... up to what, 64?
Just a thought and wishful thinking ..
------------------
Mike Luther
[email protected]
next version of PB for DOS for CALLS and SUBS and so on?
Yes, I realize that SPEED is all important! Yes I realize that the
added number of them imposes other penalties as the total possible
grows. However, even if I had 32 instead of 16, it would have made
a whale of a lot less PUBLIC use needed for really complex work.
Perhaps the code behaves as now for 16 or less, and slower, but still
can be compiled for 17-32 .. and so on ... up to what, 64?
Just a thought and wishful thinking ..
------------------
Mike Luther
[email protected]
Comment