Announcement

**Sven Blumenstein** · 5 Dec 2000, 09:59 AM

Yes, there is now way to convert Forms except you rewrite you Program (correct me if anybody know a way *g*)

But, you can use a program called "Fusion". Read about it at www.bit-arts.com. This could be your solution.

regards,
Sven

------------------

**Wayne Diamond** · 5 Dec 2000, 10:04 AM

Why "change over"? Why not exploit the powers of BOTH? - isnt it about choosing the right tool for the job?
Ive been programming in VB since i was about 12, and here ten years later Ive found PB. I use VB for the majority of my work - and all my GUI programs (im not very good with designing forms/dialogs using code only - which is why i rely on Visual Basic's visual editor)
I do all my demo coding in PB/CC, as its just so easy and convenient to do simple things in a command prompt without having to worry about buttons and forms etc. My smaller GUI programs I'll do in PB\DLL, but only if the GUI is very simple.
So i think you'd be crazy to choose VB over PB, or PB over VB - use both, because they both have very different specialties. PB's compiler leaves VB's compiler for dust, but VB's GUI designer leaves PB's DDT for dust, and so on, so you cant really compare the two - they both compliment each other beautifully though!
VB and PB are like peas and carrots, and you can do some _serious_ cooking with both of them!

Best of luck,
Wayne

[This message has been edited by Wayne Diamond (edited December 05, 2000).]

**Vikki Dawson** · 5 Dec 2000, 10:23 AM

Originally posted by Sven Blumenstein:
Yes, there is now way to convert Forms except you rewrite you Program (correct me if anybody know a way *g*)

But, you can use a program called "Fusion". Read about it at www.bit-arts.com. This could be your solution.

regards,
Sven

Hi Sven,

I did try out the demo of Fusion. The problem is that I couldn't get it to work as advertised. However, that was a year ago so maybe I'll go check it out again.

Thanks for you thoughts on this.

------------------
Vikki

**Vikki Dawson** · 5 Dec 2000, 10:32 AM

Originally posted by Wayne Diamond:
Why "change over"? Why not exploit the powers of BOTH? - isnt it about choosing the right tool for the job?
Ive been programming in VB since i was about 12, and here ten years later Ive found PB. I use VB for the majority of my work - and all my GUI programs (im not very good with designing forms/dialogs using code only - which is why i rely on Visual Basic's visual editor)
I do all my demo coding in PB/CC, as its just so easy and convenient to do simple things in a command prompt without having to worry about buttons and forms etc. My smaller GUI programs I'll do in PB\DLL, but only if the GUI is very simple.
So i think you'd be crazy to choose VB over PB, or PB over VB - use both, because they both have very different specialties. PB's compiler leaves VB's compiler for dust, but VB's GUI designer leaves PB's DDT for dust, and so on, so you cant really compare the two - they both compliment each other beautifully though!
VB and PB are like peas and carrots, and you can do some _serious_ cooking with both of them!

Best of luck,
Wayne

[This message has been edited by Wayne Diamond (edited December 05, 2000).]

Hi Wayne,

It confuses me because now I'm not sure which compiler I need. If I continue to create my GUI in VB(Can I convert the VB .frm files to PB DDT files?), what is the next step? Do I write and compile with PB/DLL or PBCC? Guess I need to go read again about the differences.

Thanks for your reply,

------------------
Vikki

**Edwin Knoppert** · 5 Dec 2000, 10:53 AM

Vikki,

Try my FreeDDT tool.
It converts VB forms to several formats.
The DDT version is the easiest to implement.
(Then ignore the other outputs)
Each scanned project generates at least a .DDT file with an example to get quick results.

It only generates DDT code to add controls on a provided DDT-dialog.
(A procedure to create the dialog is also available)
The handling of the controls is something you need to do yourself.
Check the samples like PBNote etc.. how to do this..

Click the 'profile' icon above to check out my site if you want..

------------------
[email protected]

**Edwin Knoppert** · 5 Dec 2000, 10:55 AM

I heard several complaints about fushion.
Like reinstalling problems etc..

------------------
[email protected]

**Sven Blumenstein** · 5 Dec 2000, 11:38 AM

@ Vikki:
If you post your e-mail adress, I can send you a tip about Fusion

Or just send me a mail: [email protected]

------------------

**Don Dickinson** · 5 Dec 2000, 11:40 AM

You might want to have a look at EZ GUI www.ezgui.com

The author (chris boss) is very active in these forums. His product makes dealing with forms a snap. Maybe not quite as easy as vb, but darn close.

DDT isn't bad either, though you need to be able to think of forms as text commands (e.g. put a text box at location 10, 20) instead of drawing them.

Per mixing vb and pb, that's ok, but it doesn't solve the original problem that you have with vb - the dependencies. If you were switching for speed reasons, this might be a good approach. But, if it's for eliminating dependencies, then you might want to look at using an all PB solution - DDT, EZGUI, whatever.

Best Regards,
Don

------------------
--Don
www.basicguru.com/dickinson

**Chris Boss** · 5 Dec 2000, 02:15 PM

Vikki;

EZGUI was created as an alternative for VB programmers who want
to use PB. EZGUI apps can do things that would have required 2 or 3
extra OCX's (ActiveX controls) in VB. EZGUI has its own Visual
Designer as well.

Come visit our Online forum and ask our customers what they think
of EZGUI !

EZGUI 1.0 was written using PB DLL 5.0 (a plug for PB!)

------------------

**Vikki Dawson** · 5 Dec 2000, 04:02 PM

[QUOTE]Originally posted by Edwin Knoppert:
[B]Vikki,

Try my FreeDDT tool.

Thanks Edwin, I will check out FreeDDT. Your site is great by the way.

------------------
Vikki

**Vikki Dawson** · 5 Dec 2000, 04:18 PM

I have to say I am very impressed with all the help you all have given today.

That is a plus towards purchasing PB/DLL in itself.

Don, I think you've hit it right on the head. For what my app does it works fairly speedy(I'll say fairly because onload it's a little slow on my P166), so right now at least speed is not an issue. However, I can see when I get into my other apps where speed will definitely be a factor.

Chris and Don, EZGUI looks like just what I need to be comfortable with PB/DLL. If I lose all these dratted dependencies and don't have to overload my poor brain with a lot of learning in a short period I'll be fine. From the example code on Chris' site it looks like I shouldn't have much trouble with that part at least.

Sven, I've emailed you to hear your thoughts on Fusion. I'll wait to make a decision on that until I hear from you. At this point no matter what it looks like I'll purchase PB/DLL and grab EZGUI(is it really free or did I miss something?) and get started on my next projects. Who knows with Edwins form tool I may be able to easily convert the existing project over to PB without a lot of trouble.

You guys are great and have really helped me to make my decision. As Wayne says, I won't be throwing away VB but it looks to me like my better option for right now is to use PB.

So, I guess you'll see me around when I run into trouble because I'm going to go ahead and at least get PB/DLL for right now.

Thanks to you all for all your help.

------------------
Vikki

**Vikki Dawson** · 5 Dec 2000, 04:32 PM

Found the order page Chris and as soon as I have a look at PB I'll decide whether I need to purchase that too.

Thanks,

------------------
Vikki

**Chris Boss** · 5 Dec 2000, 05:36 PM

Vikki;

Just to make sure one point is clear :

The Freeware DDT Visual Designer we offer is not the same thing
as EZGUI. It is for those who can handle the API and who prefer
DDT. (Yes, that is free).

EZGUI on the other hand is a commercial (it costs something)
GUI engine that allows you to build PB apps without using a
single API function call. You do "not" have to understand a
single API function to use EZGUI. EZGUI 1.0 is a 122 KB runtime
DLL that you must ship with your PB app (royalty free).
EZGUI 1.0 comes with its "own" Visual Designer !

To appreciate how powerful EZGUI 1.0 is :

Both the EZGUI Visual Designer and the Freeware DDT Visual
Designer are themselves EZGUI apps !

Both Visual Designers are 100% EZGUI apps which use absolutely
"NO" API function calls at all. They only use EZGUI functions.

------------------

**Vikki Dawson** · 5 Dec 2000, 05:51 PM

Hi Chris,

Yep I went back and saw the differences. I started to order PB but it does not appear they use a secure server. I had my cc info was stolen online last year when purchasing software on a non-secure server so I'll call them tomorrow to order PB and I think I have pretty much decided to purchase EZGUI so I'll be doing that in just a few minutes.

Looks like just the ticket for me right now.

I'll learn DDT because I should but for now I'll go with EZGUI.

------------------
Vikki

**Wayne Diamond** · 5 Dec 2000, 10:44 PM

Vikki, PB/CC and PB/DLL have to be my two best purchases this year - i still get those warm fuzzies when I compile tiny, tight, strong standalone apps in PB - it has added a whole new dimension to my programming, and regardless of which you choose I know you will be satisfied!
Best of luck,
Wayne

------------------

**Steve Hutchesson** · 6 Dec 2000, 01:28 AM

Vikki,

I think in the longer term that shifting to PowerBASIC will work for you
in that it gives you a number of ways of coding. Chris has a well accepted
package in EZGUI that makes the shift a lot easier.

You have the option later of using DDT style coding which will give you a
lot of power and when you have been at it for a while, you will find
writing pure API style code starts to become a lot easier.

As I understand, the next version of VB will be .NET based so VB as it is
known now will probably cease to exist which leaves programmers who want
to write general purpose binary programs out in the cold. PowerBASIC are
specialised high performance compilers which have a "sky is the limit"
approach and you have a reasonably flexible range of how you write code.

Shifting to procedural code is a bit of a change but with the tools and
toys available, its not as hard as it used to be if you had to jump into
windows in C like it was in 16 bit windows.

You are welcome to have a play with the code generating tools on my site
but they are pure API style code and may be a bit unfamiliar if you don't
have a background in API code at the moment but its worth noting that
working directly in Windows API calls is a lot easier in a true compiler
than it was in VB as they are just system functions that you use naturally
in PowerBASIC.
http://www.pbq.com.au/home/hutch/pbdll50.htm

Regards,

[email protected]

------------------

**Wayne Diamond** · 6 Dec 2000, 02:22 AM

Steve,
VB7, VC# (VC sharp), and VC++ will all share the same single common runtime library (as opposed to msvbvm60.dll for VB6, msvcrt for VC++ , etc), and yes it can compile exe's, so i don't think VB coders will at all be left in the dark as you put it. If anything, i think it moves VB coders closer to VC++ and C# coders, as there will be a lot of 'intertwining' between the languages, a lot more so than there is already. The .net **** means nothing to me, and it's release is no reason to get rid of VB6, so ... she'll be right
By the way, im certain that I read that you can even create - wait for it - console applications with VB7. Cool huh? (Still needs the runtime though, ******!). Also, VB7 brings polymorphism and "true" object-orientism[tm], so things are looking up
I look forward to adding VB7 to my compiler arsenal, but somehow I think I'll still be using VB6 more than VB7
Either way, i dont think PB can ever replace VB, and I dont think VB can ever replace PB - they've both got big places in my heart! <grin>

Best regards,
Wayne

------------------
*** Edited by Administrator

**Chris Boss** · 6 Dec 2000, 05:46 AM

Vikki;

I think you will be amazed at what EZGUI 1.0 can do in such a small
package. Also I agree with some of Steves sentiments in that EZGUI
is a good starting point, then you can progressively learn DDT and
then later learn pure SDK style coding (API).

EZGUI "encourages" this approach, since it allows easy "integration"
of API functionality in an EZGUI app, so you can "experiment" with
API concepts. The Freeware Visual Designer uses the same file format
for Forms, so some of your smaller apps that don't require all the
functionality can be coded in DDT. Simply use the Forms created
in the EZGUI Visual Designer, load them into the Freeware Designer
and then generate pure DDT code (with no need of a runtime).

Both tools help you learn more about how Windows really works which
prepares you for the last step, of writing pure SDK style apps.

The fact that using PB DLL 6.0 allows "all three" techniques for
writing an app is a real plus. VB doesn't offer a lower level
of programming without runtimes.

Also EZGUI 2.0 (Beta) is already in development and it will add functionality
not even found in VB. Things like WinLift support, Improved Visual
Design engine, autoscaling Forms/controls, Turtle Graphics control,
Drag Handle control, Rich Edit control, Drag List boxes and more.

EZGUI was written using PB DLL (5/6) and could never have
been created without it !

------------------

**Andy Anderson** · 6 Dec 2000, 06:43 AM

Wayne,

I'm inclined (with qualifications) to agree with your analysis
of PB vs VB. DDT is excellent for creating small dialogs but
at this point, I don't consider it convenient for large scale
GUI bound apps. Chris's stuff looks pretty good and is closer
to being a good starting point if you are coming over from VB
but I feel it needs a few more features to make it viable as
a general GUI tool.

There are other offerings such as Hutch's and Ed Turner's tools
but they are SDK style and require a working API knowledge base.

Despite its' bloat, lack of speed, bugginess and dependencies,
VB is still the easiest way to create a robust GUI. It is this
factor that is solely responsible for its' popularity.

PB fits very well as the processing engine compliment to VB. You
can code a general dll containing all the neat functions that VB
doesn't have and use it with a VB user interface. For programs
that crunch data, you SHELL/CALL from VB to straight PB for the
processing. It's not a bad set up. (g)

As far as VB7, we're definately not going there. We're still using
VB5 and will do so till 64 bits becomes dominant. By that time, we
figure DDT will be refined enough for general GUI work and we can
drop VB entirely.

As an aside, Eric Pearson has done some marvelous work intermingling the console with graphics. If future versions of Windows support a more consistant console, that route would be worth considering.

Andy Anderson
THREE Systems

------------------

Announcement

VB to PB

VB to PB

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment