Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Backward incompatibility?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Backward incompatibility?

    Compiles In PBWin 8 but Not In PBWin 9
    Error 543 - Must be outside Sub/Function

    '
    Code:
    #Compile Exe  
    #Include "WIN32API.INC"
    Sub test_Include 
        %Top = %MB_TASKMODAL 'keep for older msgbox msgs  
    End Sub
    Function PBMain
      Call test_Include
      ? "Worked"
    End Function
    '
    It's a pretty day. I hope you enjoy it.

    Gösta

    JWAM: (Quit Smoking): http://www.SwedesDock.com/smoking
    LDN - A Miracle Drug: http://www.SwedesDock.com/LDN/

    #2
    Yes it's a new restriction due to the forward-referencing feature.
    Simply move the constant(s) outside of a FUNCTION or SUB and the code will compile fine.
    kgpsoftware.com | Slam DBMS | PrpT Control | Other Downloads | Contact Me

    Comment


      #3
      Looks like only subs/functions can be forward referenced, right? I tried a quick test to see if equates and types could be forward referenced and I don't think they can. They need to be defined prior to being referenced. Am I correct in saying that?
      Paul Squires
      FireFly Visual Designer (for PowerBASIC Windows 10+)
      Version 3 now available.
      http://www.planetsquires.com

      Comment


        #4
        Yes.
        Forum: http://www.jose.it-berater.org/smfforum/index.php

        Comment


          #5
          They need to be defined prior to being referenced.
          They can now be redefined prior to being used.
          Rod
          In some future era, dark matter and dark energy will only be found in Astronomy's Dark Ages.

          Comment


            #6
            Just to be clear the help file notes (What's New, Additional Changes), an equate (constant) that can be re-defined before use is one "which is pre-defined in the compiler"

            Here's the complete change remark:
            Any numeric equate or string equate which is pre-defined in the compiler may be assigned a revised value if the new assignment is performed before the equate is referenced in the program
            Last edited by Richard Angell; 29 Aug 2008, 12:24 PM. Reason: ADDED EMPHASIS ...
            Rick Angell

            Comment


              #7
              I would consider a slight language rewrite as follows:

              The value of any numeric equate or string equate which is pre-defined in the compiler may overridden if the new assignment is performed before the equate is referenced in the program
              <b>George W. Bleck</b>
              <img src='http://www.blecktech.com/myemail.gif'>

              Comment


                #8
                which is pre-defined in the compiler
                Who put that there?
                Well, that's only my second mistake, first since 1962.

                Glad somebody caught it.
                Last edited by Rodney Hicks; 29 Aug 2008, 07:19 PM. Reason: add to
                Rod
                In some future era, dark matter and dark energy will only be found in Astronomy's Dark Ages.

                Comment


                  #9
                  It's just as well that that it's only pre-defined constants. Otherwise you could inadvertently redefine some equate you forgot you had used and buried deep down in some #INCLUDE file.

                  That's why I use #IF %DEF(%equate_name) a lot. Very handy.

                  Still waiting (apparently) for support for '%Def (procedure_name)' but setting my own equates and using %DEF(%equate_meaning_procedure_name_is_defined) works OK.

                  #UNDEF and/or #REDEF would still be useful.

                  MCM
                  Michael Mattias
                  Tal Systems (retired)
                  Port Washington WI USA
                  [email protected]
                  http://www.talsystems.com

                  Comment


                    #10
                    delete
                    Last edited by Dale Yarker; 30 Aug 2008, 10:29 AM.
                    Dale

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X
                    😀
                    🥰
                    🤢
                    😎
                    😡
                    👍
                    👎