Colin got me thinking on UDT's and if you do not know how many elements you may or may not have over to "Passing UDT values to DLLs"
and maybe crossing over to my "Get that DataType"
So it got me to thinking if there may be some "Mad-Scientist" idea of possibly having a UDT, or some set of functions to fill in a UDT of unknown size and values until runtime??????
One idea I had included what I have been told is not only unsupported, but also not advised, but see it in the "Win32Api.inc" is using an array within a UDT (Yes I know...tons of research to do, but its just an idea and even I would not support it till tested, but just grasping at straws that just MIGHT might pan out...if not then nothing lost)
Just for the sake of trying....is it worth trying? or will the 99.9% of you say what I usually do and have ideas why it should not / can not be done?
(Or is it just crazy enough that it might just work????)

and maybe crossing over to my "Get that DataType"
So it got me to thinking if there may be some "Mad-Scientist" idea of possibly having a UDT, or some set of functions to fill in a UDT of unknown size and values until runtime??????
One idea I had included what I have been told is not only unsupported, but also not advised, but see it in the "Win32Api.inc" is using an array within a UDT (Yes I know...tons of research to do, but its just an idea and even I would not support it till tested, but just grasping at straws that just MIGHT might pan out...if not then nothing lost)
Just for the sake of trying....is it worth trying? or will the 99.9% of you say what I usually do and have ideas why it should not / can not be done?
(Or is it just crazy enough that it might just work????)

Comment