Thanks Hutch,
99% of the time I use it to copy data from one TYPE variable to
another. Sometimes it is a straight copy, other times I only copy
one half of the first variable into the other, etc... I find
being able to specify the source address (which could be half
way within a TYPE variable) and a destination address very
convenient.
There are a couple of places in my code where I will put the
code directly instead of incurring the overhead of setting up
the function call. Thanks.
BTW, would you happen to have a super fast way to retrieve a
defined portion of a TYPE variable into a DYNAMIC string. Currently,
I am using your MemCopyD routine to copy from the VARPTR of the
TYPE to the STRPTR of the dynamic string for a given length value.
It works fine - is that way okay. It seems to be faster than using MID$.
Thanks,
------------------
Paul Squires
www.PlanetSquires.com
mailto:[email protected]
[email protected]
</A>
99% of the time I use it to copy data from one TYPE variable to
another. Sometimes it is a straight copy, other times I only copy
one half of the first variable into the other, etc... I find
being able to specify the source address (which could be half
way within a TYPE variable) and a destination address very
convenient.
There are a couple of places in my code where I will put the
code directly instead of incurring the overhead of setting up
the function call. Thanks.
BTW, would you happen to have a super fast way to retrieve a
defined portion of a TYPE variable into a DYNAMIC string. Currently,
I am using your MemCopyD routine to copy from the VARPTR of the
TYPE to the STRPTR of the dynamic string for a given length value.
It works fine - is that way okay. It seems to be faster than using MID$.
Thanks,
------------------
Paul Squires
www.PlanetSquires.com
mailto:[email protected]
[email protected]
</A>
Comment