Question to Bob Zale

[Gary Beene]

Yep, derivation from acumen - I made it up.

acumen - shrewdness shown by keen insight

Although, the word "acuminous" would have perhaps be a better choice (and in the dictionary too!).

I don't know why the shift from "en" to "in".

[Gösta H. Lovgren-2]

I think Gary is just trying to modernise the English language

Many of the responses are acerbic and/or contain acumen.

Bob

Nice catch Bob. Never occurred to me. acumenical should be a word, and henceforth shall be in my lexica:

Acumnen n. Quickness, accuracy, and keenness of judgment or insight.

Acumenical adj. Acumen displayed with undertones of ascerbic religious fervor. (Used only by REAL men).

======================
Afternoon tea
Teddy Bear takes
three sugars
C. William Hinderliter
======================

[Manuel Valdes]

Could it be ecumenical?

Merriam Webster:
2 entries found.

ecumenical

1. ecumenical patriarch

Main Entry:
ec·u·men·i·cal Pronunciation: \ˌe-kyə-ˈme-ni-kəl, -kyü-\ Function: adjective Etymology: Late Latin oecumenicus, from Late Greek oikoumenikos, from Greek oikoumenē the inhabited world, from feminine of oikoumenos, present passive participle of oikein to inhabit, from oikos house Date: circa 1587 1: worldwide or general in extent, influence, or application
2
a: of, relating to, or representing the whole of a body of churches
b: promoting or tending toward worldwide Christian unity or cooperation
— ec·u·men·i·cal·ly \-k(ə-)lē\ adverb

[Knuth Konrad]

http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/acumen

http://www.google.de/search?hl=en&q=define%3Aacumen&btnG=Search

[Robert Wallace]

I couldn't decide if acerbic or acumenical responses were the norm

I think Gary is just trying to modernise the English language

Many of the responses are acerbic and/or contain acumen.

Bob

[Gösta H. Lovgren-2]

Quote:...
By the way what the heck is acumenical??? Google eludes

Very very very clever, as ... acumenical ... does not appear to be an actual word. (Elude 2. To escape the understanding or grasp of ...)

to it being something religious...

Oh bummer. I see you now meant allude (Allude - To make an indirect reference). Not so clever after all. Actually ... {laughing here at my own droll cleveriosity}

===================================
"Being politically correct means
always having to say you're sorry."
Anonymous
===================================

[Cliff Nichols]

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gary Beene
I had to post here -
... acumenical ...

???

My best answer

orangutan

?????


(Anyone missing the razz must not be in NY and not see the hilarious joke over words and kind of a locale classic)

By the way what the heck is acumenical??? Google eludes to it being something religious...but could not find a definition....

$50 word I take it???

[Gösta H. Lovgren-2]

I had to post here -
... acumenical ...

???

=================================
Why worry about martial law when
there is pork to be harvested
and photo ops to attend?"
Joe Byrne
=================================

[Cliff Nichols]

I was beginning to wonder Gary (your typing style does not usually warrant $20 words)

$20 word scare me.

(That and I have to look them up just to get the gist of the joke)

Bob....when are you hiring for the team to handle obscure sarcasms that insult until the insult-ee learns WHYYYYyyy the insult???

(not to mention when the insult is unwarranted, given the experience of the person asking, vs experience of the answer (and often the answer can be wrong depending the scope of the question))

[Gary Beene]

I had to post here - Gosta made me chuckle out loud!

Bob, I don't think you want to start doing that. It could turn out to be a major undertaking.

What would the forums be without their personalities!

When I first joined the forums I was often taken aback - I couldn't decide if acerbic or acumenical responses were the norm. Now, I can't wait to get my daily dose of a stick in the eye!

It's like when I play tennis (I have a very strong forehand) - I feel obligated to crush the ball when someone has the temerity to hit a ball to that side.

That's kind of how it is in the forums here. If you ask a question, you have to expect a drink from a fire hose - and sometimes the water is very cold or very hot!

It's a great place to have fun.

(and yes, I have been reading "Thomas Covenant - The Unbeliever". It's author tosses out words I've never even seen so I'm finding myself trying to use a broader vocabulary than usual).

[Michael Mattias]

Well, it IS an exception.... a null pointer was passed to a function expecting a pointer.

You can't ask the compiler and related tools to know if a null pointer is "OK" in this case, you can only ask the tool to tell you if the pointer was NULL.

BTW, you would not get that exception if instead of passing literal null ("") at the point of call you passed asciiz variables which just happen to be null. Of course, your function would now have to deal with this possibility as well.

MCM

[Peter Redei]

Michael,
I think you totally missed the point.
The problem is not how to evaluate the passed ASCIIZ data in the DLL. The exception occurs BEFORE the data gets to the DLL when it is an empty string.
In real life #DEBUG DISPLAY ON indeed is not there but the exception itself is. As I said I used ASCIIZ extensively in my DLLs and I am not aware of any problem with them. The #DEBUG DISPLAY ON just made me suspicious.


Peter Redei

[Gösta H. Lovgren-2]

I apologize for his last sentence.

Bob, I don't think you want to start doing that. It could turn out to be a major undertaking.

=============================================
I have taken all knowledge to be my province.
Sir Francis Bacon
=============================================

[Bob Zale]

Hi Peter--

The first part of Michael's response was very correct. ASCIIZ parameters are a very important concept, and should be considered for any multi-language DLL. It's easy to test them for nul, as he demonstrated, and that's a good procedure to follow.

I apologize for his last sentence.

Best regards,

Bob Zale
PowerBASIC Inc.

[Walter Henn]

...
Maybe you were out sick that day, but testing for and handling "null string" like this is part of the "Writing Library Functions 101" class.

MCM

Is this kind of comment really necessary, Michael? Put downs like this say a lot more about you than the person you're putting down.

[Michael Mattias]

Huh? checking the parameter is simple enough...

#COMPILE DLL 

FUNCTION Foo (szA AS ASCIIZ, szB AS ASCIIZ) EXPORT AS LONG 

    IF VARPTR (szA) <> 0& THEN 
         szA  is available to read or write (up to valid length) 
        .....
   IF VARPTR (szB) <> 0& THEN 
         szB  is available to read or write (up to valid length)

If the string is not available to your procedure, just DON'T USE IT.

That the #DEBUG DISPLAY compile option does something is immaterial, since that is not used at production time.

Using null-terminated (ASCIIZ) strings by reference and setting that address to zero when the string is null is far and away the most common way to pass string parameters among procedures in the World of Windows.

Maybe you were out sick that day, but testing for and handling "null string" like this is part of the "Writing Library Functions 101" class.

MCM

[Peter Redei]

Thank you Bob and Michael. The problem is that there is no way to check the passed value in the DLL when I pass ASCIIZ. The exception occurs before the value gets to the DLL but only when Call DWORD/LoadLibrary, etc is used. I believe the best way is probably not to use ASCIIZ that will bring an additional advantage of supporting unicode strings and localization. Until Bob wrote about #DEBUG DISPLAY ON I had no idea about this problem and perhaps it caused some later crashes I could not account anything for.


Peter Redei

[Michael Mattias]

The issue raises another question: since we have no control over the value someone passes to a DLL function does that mean we should never create a function passing ASCIIZ?

Au contraire... if you are designing a function for "other language" programmers to use, NTS (ASCIIZ) strings are probably the best way to design the call.

But I would never design a function for others to use that did NOT validate every passed parameter. As far as I'm concerned that just comes with the territory.

[Bob Zale]

Peter--

There's nothing that unique about ASCIIZ parameters. You cannot control what the caller is going to pass as a parameter. It's really easy to pass a dangerous value for any data type if the user isn't careful enough.

It may be that your DLL should check every parameter for valid data and pointers before it even starts to function. That's the safest thing to do, but you have to weigh it against the time it takes to do that. Most DLL's, including the WinAPI, put that responsibility on the caller, and do not validate.

Bob Zale
PowerBASIC Inc.

[Peter Redei]

Michael,

You got it right. Thank you very much.
The issue raises another question: since we have no control over the value someone passes to a DLL function does that mean we should never create a function passing ASCIIZ? I have to admit I used ASCIIZ in such places broadly in the last 10+ years.

Peter Redei